Warren Gammill & Associates, P.L.

Call Us Today: 305-874-0317

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Warren P. Gammill
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Intentional Torts
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Commercial Landlord-Tenant
      • Real Estate Fraud
      • Deed & Probate Litigation
  • Blog
  • Contact
Warren Gammill & Associates, P.L.
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Warren P. Gammill
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Intentional Torts
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Commercial Landlord-Tenant
      • Real Estate Fraud
      • Deed & Probate Litigation
  • Blog
  • Contact
 305-874-0317
Decades Of Tactical, Trial-Ready Advocacy In Commercial Litigation
  1. Home
  2.  – 
  3. Contract Disputes
  4.  – 
  5. The difference between material and minor contract breaches

The difference between material and minor contract breaches

On Behalf of Warren Gammill & Associates, P.L. | Sep 11, 2015 | Contract Disputes

Once two parties reach an agreement in terms and sign on the dotted line of a contract, they are both legally obligated to follow through on their acknowledged promises. If one party should fail to deliver on their promises, then that party is said to be in breach of contract.

There are two broad categories of contractual breaches; minor and material. In the case of a minor breach, the terms of the contract are generally upheld, but the breaching party may have to provide financial compensation for damages to the nonbreaching party.

Take for example a builder who fails to complete a project within the deadline stated in the contract, but will still be able to finish the job according to all other specifications. The builder may have to provide remuneration for the inconvenience caused by the delay, but otherwise the agreement stays intact.

On the other hand, a material breach is a breach of such severity that the nonbreaching party cannot feasibly be compensated for the damages done. In such cases, the nonbreaching party is no longer obligated to fulfill its obligations while the breaching party will likely be required to pay for damages. The court would typically view situations where the breaching party acted negligently, or willfully refused to meet its obligations, as causing a material breach.

A material breach situation could be if a builder used defective materials when constructing a house. If the use of these materials rendered the house uninhabitable, the nonbreaching party would hold no responsibility to pay the builder and the builder could be required to pay compensation.

In breach of contract situations, it is important to determine if the breach rises to the level of being material or if it is still possible for the agreement to continue to its conclusion. If you are in a contract dispute, a Florida business contract attorney may be able to help you get a satisfactory resolution.

Recent Posts

  • The economic impact of construction delays
  • Breach of contract vs. breach of fiduciary duty: How they differ
  • When a signed contract is deemed invalid
  • When does an unpaid commercial debt become a legal claim?
  • Did a commercial landlord violate an exclusive use clause?

Archives

Categories

  • Business Litigation
  • Business Torts
  • Commercial Real Estate
  • Construction Litigation
  • Contract Disputes
  • Legal Malpractice
  • Uncategorized

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

FindLaw Network

Request A Strategic Consultation

Warren Gammill & Associates, P.L.

Address

Courthouse Plaza
28 West Flagler St #400
Miami, FL 33130
 Miami Office

Phone Number

305-874-0317
  • Follow
Review Us

© 2026 Warren Gammill & Associates, P.L. • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

© 2026 Warren Gammill & Associates, P.L. • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

Review Us