Warren Gammill & Associates, P.L.

Call Us Today: 305-874-0317

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Warren P. Gammill
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Intentional Torts
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Commercial Landlord-Tenant
      • Real Estate Fraud
      • Deed & Probate Litigation
  • Blog
  • Contact
Warren Gammill & Associates, P.L.
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Warren P. Gammill
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Intentional Torts
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Commercial Landlord-Tenant
      • Real Estate Fraud
      • Deed & Probate Litigation
  • Blog
  • Contact
 305-874-0317
Decades Of Tactical, Trial-Ready Advocacy In Commercial Litigation
  1. Home
  2.  – 
  3. Contract Disputes
  4.  – 
  5. An appeals court sides with Michael Jackson’s estate

An appeals court sides with Michael Jackson’s estate

On Behalf of Warren Gammill & Associates, P.L. | May 27, 2020 | Contract Disputes

Florida business disputes can have significant ramifications on the companies that are involved in them. The end result of these lawsuits can have an impact on the bottom line of millions of dollars. Recently, an appeals court greatly reduced a large verdict against the estate of Michael Jackson in an example of a long-running dispute over the interpretation of a contract.

Here, famed produce Quincy Jones filed a lawsuit against the deceased pop star’s estate. Two of his songs were used in a movie about Jackson and in a Cirque du Soleil show. The two had a contract that said that Jones could be paid for the use of his songs in a “video show.” Here, the issue in court was whether these two mediums represented a “video show” that would entitle Jones to payment. The jury found that this was the case. However, the appeals court held that contract interpretation was something for the judge to do in the case. Then, the judge would instruct the jury.

Moreover, the appeals court also ruled that the jury was incorrect in its interpretation of the contract. Accordingly, the appeals court trimmed the size of the verdict from $9.4 million to $2.5 million. For Jackson’s estate, this is a win because Jones was seeking $30 in his initial lawsuit. This may bring this long-running saga to a close.

When a business or an individual is involved in a disagreement over a term in an agreement that they signed, they should retain the services of a contract disputes attorney. Courts will often need to interpret specific terms of the contract in order to reach a resolution.

Recent Posts

  • The economic impact of construction delays
  • Breach of contract vs. breach of fiduciary duty: How they differ
  • When a signed contract is deemed invalid
  • When does an unpaid commercial debt become a legal claim?
  • Did a commercial landlord violate an exclusive use clause?

Archives

Categories

  • Business Litigation
  • Business Torts
  • Commercial Real Estate
  • Construction Litigation
  • Contract Disputes
  • Legal Malpractice
  • Uncategorized

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

FindLaw Network

Request A Strategic Consultation

Warren Gammill & Associates, P.L.

Address

Courthouse Plaza
28 West Flagler St #400
Miami, FL 33130
 Miami Office

Phone Number

305-874-0317
  • Follow
Review Us

© 2026 Warren Gammill & Associates, P.L. • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

© 2026 Warren Gammill & Associates, P.L. • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

Review Us